Senior High School Strands: Factors Affecting the Students’ Preference

Princes Aires Malaguial(1), Goji Gacoscos(2), Edward Martinez(3), Hassanal Abusama(4), Anamarie Valdez(5),


(1) Sultan Kudarat State University
(2) Sultan Kudarat State University
(3) Sultan Kudarat State University
(4) Sultan Kudarat State University
(5) Sultan Kudarat State University
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Choosing a senior high school strand is one of the most challenging decisions that junior high school students will have to face. The study aimed to help students decide on their future senior high school strand by knowing the factors’ influence levels and their relationship with their decision. The survey was conducted online (Grade 9 and Grade 10 students) using the total sampling method. We employed a self-made questionnaire that went through content validation using Aiken’s V formula. Descriptive statistics were then used to analyze and interpret the results of the study. In the survey’s results, 2.3% of the students chose GAS as their senior high school strand, 15.9% chose HUMSS, and 73.9% chose STEM, leaving the ABM strand with 8%. The personal interest factor had the highest level of influence among the factors, with a mean of 4.21, followed by job opportunities with a mean of 4.17, socioeconomic status with a mean of 3.89, parents with a mean of 3.63, and academic performance with a mean of 3.38. However, in terms of the factors’ significant relationships with the senior high school strands, socioeconomic status, parents, job opportunities, and personal interests were found to have no significant influence when deciding, and academic performance is the only factor that has a significant influence on the students’ preferred strand. As a result, the null hypothesis of the study is accepted because only one out of five factors were found to have a significant relationship when deciding on a senior high school strand.

Keywords


Academic performance; Job opportunities; Parents; Personal interests; Senior high school strands; SKSU; Socio-economic status

References


Deil-Amen, R. (2011). Socio-academic integrative moments: Rethinking academic and social integration among two-year college students in career-related programs. Journal of Higher Education, 82(1), 54-91.

Magnaye, R. P. (2020). Self-Perception of ABM students towards their academic, social and emotional college preparedness. Online Submission, 1(2), 1-18.

Moneva, J. C., and Malbas, M. H. (2019). Preferences in senior high school tracks of the grade 10 students. IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies, 15(5), 167-174.

Nyamwange, J. (2016). Influence of student's interest on career choice among first year university students in public and private universities in country, Kisi Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(4), 96-102.

Santric-Milicevic, M. M., Terzic-Supic, Z. J., Matejic, B. R., Vasic, V., and Ricketts III, T. C. (2014). First-and fifth-year medical students’ intention for emigration and practice abroad: a case study of Serbia. Health Policy, 118(2), 173-183.

Sugano, S. G. C., and Mamolo, L. A. (2021). Analysis of students' aptitude and academic performance: input to curriculum enhancement. Anatolian Journal of Education, 6(2), 51-62.

Vyas, S., and Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health policy and planning, 21(6), 459-468.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 88631 times
PDF Download : 241795 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Bumi Publikasi Nusantara

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.