Stakeholder’s Perceived Reasons for Decentralization Reform in School-Based Management

Moses Adeleke Adeoye(1),


(1) Al-Hikmah University Ilorin
Corresponding Author

Abstract


School-Based Management (SBM) is a strategy to decentralize decision-making authority to the individual school and devolution of authority is the fundamental concept in educational reform. This study analyses the dynamics of the SBM policy and implementation at the school level. The study was approached through document analysis of the perception of stakeholders at school levels through previous studies analyses. These approaches produced rich data on issues relating to SBM policy and community involvement. The SBM decree did not choose a particular model of SBM instead it imposed a uniform model regardless of school level, size, location, type of community or even the public nature of schools. It was concluded that the level of participation of the school stakeholders in the different school-initiated activities can be significantly affected. Due to the SBM regulatory requirements, it has failed to fulfil its original intention of improving the quality of education to the maximum standard. The stakeholders’ perceptionregarding school-based management implementation policy on the devolution of authority was determined to be moderate. It was discovered that the level of SBM implementation was on the minimum standard. It was suggested that there is still a need for the schools to be encouraged to achieve more development and graft on SBM implementation.

Keywords


Educational decentralization; School based management; School stakeholders

References


AL-Momani, M. O., and Rababa, E. M. (2022). Mixed education and quality standard in the university teaching: A theoretical study. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 2(3), 155-174.

Annisa, V. N., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Kurniawan, T., and Bilad, M. R. (2022). Time management implementation in daily activities during pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 2(1), 77-82.

Cabardo, J. R. O., (2016). Levels of participation of the school stakeholders in the different school-initiated activities and the implementation of school-based management. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 8(1), 81-94.

Gamage, D. T., and Zajda. J. (2005). Decentralization and school-based management: A comparative study of self-governing school models. International Journal of Educational Practice and Theory, 27(2), 35-58.

Glushchenko, V. V. A. (2022). General theory of organizational behavior: An educational perspective. Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 2(2), 453-468.

Hawkins, J. N. (2000). Centralization, decentralization, recentralization, educational reform in China. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(5), 442-454.

Jizat, N. A. M., and Sulong, M. S., (2021). Lecturer perspective on informal learning activities. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(2), 23-26.

Kurniati, P. S., Sholihin, I., Winarta, R., and Insan, M. H. (2021). Information technology policy through the E-government programs in improving public services quality. International Journal of Computer in Law and Political Science, 1, 1-8.

Omran, L. (2019). School-based management in public schools as perceived by principles in karak directorate of learning and education. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 7(4), 1-10.

Onia, S. I., and Ramadan, A. F. (2023). Policy for distance learning in education in higher education institutions: Experiences from Sudan. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 3(1), 59-68.

Pepugal, E. T. (2022). Levels of perception on school-based management implementation in San Luis national high school. Philippines American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 1(4), 26-34.

Rose, P. (2003). Community participation in school policy and practice in Malawi: Balancing local knowledge, national policies and international agency priorities. Compare, 33(1), 47-64.

Shaffiyah, I., Dwiyanti, V., Masek, A. (2022). Smart city and society 5.0: Involvement of information technology in the development of public service systems in Indonesia. ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education, 1(1), 31-42.

Sukmawati, D., and Maryanti, R. (2022). Development of education and economic circulation in supporting local potential as community empowerment efforts amid the Covid-19 pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 1(2), 235-250.

Supriyadi, A., Wang, T., Juwita, M., Gunaningrat, R., Safitri, S., and Cirella, G. (2021). Sustainability policy in Indonesia: Case study economic structure and determinants in Banjar municipality. International Journal of Informatics, Information System and Computer Engineering (INJIISCOM), 2(1), 25-46.

Widianti, R. I. L., and Undang, S. U. (2022). Conceptualization of metaphors: Economic condition, corruption cases, and the corruption eradication commission. ASEAN Journal of Economic and Economic Education, 1(1), 35-40.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 811 times
PDF Download : 497 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Bumi Publikasi Nusantara

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.